Original Research

An application of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and golden circle in entrepreneurship education

Regina M. Thetsane, Dario Meyer, Michael Chambwe
The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management | Vol 16, No 1 | a934 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v16i1.934 | © 2024 Regina M. Thetsane, Dario Meyer, Michael Chambwe | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 June 2024 | Published: 17 September 2024

About the author(s)

Regina M. Thetsane, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social Science, National University of Lesotho, Maseru, Lesotho
Dario Meyer, Institute of Management, School of Business, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Windisch, Switzerland
Michael Chambwe, Department of Tourism Research in Economics, Environs and Society (TREES), Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Mahikeng, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Entrepreneurship education has become an important issue worldwide, originating mainly in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). Different methods have been used to teach entrepreneurship, often without considering local circumstances, which is particularly important in sub-Saharan Africa with its diverse cultures. Therefore, comparing the impact of cultural differences in teaching entrepreneurship education in Western Europe and sub-Saharan African countries is crucial to overcoming such challenges.

Aim: This article aims to compare the impact of cultural differences in teaching entrepreneurship education in Western Europe and sub-Saharan African countries with the aim of designing appropriate entrepreneurship education programmes and approaches to the specific cultural contexts.

Setting: The study compares the impact of cultural differences in Western Europe (US and UK) and sub-Saharan African countries.

Methods: A literature review descriptive study of the impact of cultural differences in teaching entrepreneurship education in Western Europe and sub-Saharan Africa was adopted. Secondary analysis using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions’ model was used for analysis.

Results: The main cultural differences are in the dimensions of individualism versus collectivism and power distance. Incorporating team-based learning and focusing on business ideas with a positive collective impact in sub-Saharan Africa can lead to more effective entrepreneurship education.

Conclusion: It is crucial to adapt entrepreneurship education approaches to the specific cultural contexts of regions. Using a framework with four guide questions for whom, why, what and how can support the development of programmes.

Contribution: Future education programmes can be designed based on a proposed golden circle.


Keywords

entrepreneurship; education; Hofstede’s cultural dimensions; sub-Saharan Africa; golden circle; teaching methods

JEL Codes

A20: General; A22: Undergraduate; A30: General

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 232
Total article views: 219


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.