Original Research

The structural validity of the innovative work behaviour questionnaire: Comparing competing factorial models

Renier Steyn, Gideon de Bruin
The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management | Vol 11, No 1 | a291 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v11i1.291 | © 2019 Renier Steyn, Gideon de Bruin | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 24 October 2019 | Published: 11 December 2019

About the author(s)

Renier Steyn, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Graduate School of Business Leadership, University of South Africa, Midrand, South Africa
Gideon de Bruin, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: Innovation is about central organisational sustainability and is fundamentally centred in individuals.

Objectives: Understanding and building theory on innovative work behaviour (IWB), as well as the parallel measurement thereof, is a prerequisite to the development of models for enhancing IWB. Most theorists propose IWB as a sequential process involving steps such as exploration, generativity, investigation, championing and application. These steps are also reflected in the design of IWB measurements. In this study, the theorised step-structure of IWB, as proposed by Kleysen and Street in 2001, is tested – relying on general descriptive statistics and applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with five different factorial structures tested.

Methods: Complete records for more than 3000 respondents on the IWB measure were available. The results revealed that exploration and generativity occur more often than investigation, championing and application, alerting theorists to the dwindling effect of creative ideas and also to the hierarchical nature of the steps embedded in IWB. With regard to structure, the results revealed that the IWB steps were correlated, not orthogonal, and unlikely to be sequential as theorised. The initial steps of IWB (exploration and generativity) are therefore linked to the latter steps (investigation, championing and application), implying that employees are cognisant of the latter steps when engaging in the former.

Results: The results of this study suggest reconsidering the segmented stepwise thinking regarding IWB. It also has important practical implications for stimulating IWB: Enabling individuals to manage the latter ‘steps’ of the IWB may well encourage the creativity and curiosity associated with the former ‘steps’.

Conclusion: The research provides important insights into the nature of IWB, informing theoretical models using data-driven information.


Keywords

innovative work behaviour; South Africa; factorial validity; factor analyses; structural equation modelling.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 515
Total article views: 578

 

Crossref Citations

1. Gender differences in the relationship between innovation and its antecedents
Renier Steyn, Gideon de Bruin
South African Journal of Business Management  vol: 51  issue: 1  year: 2020  
doi: 10.4102/sajbm.v51i1.1675