Original Research
The structural validity of the innovative work behaviour questionnaire: Comparing competing factorial models
Submitted: 24 October 2019 | Published: 11 December 2019
About the author(s)
Renier Steyn, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Graduate School of Business Leadership, University of South Africa, Midrand, South AfricaGideon de Bruin, Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Background: Innovation is about central organisational sustainability and is fundamentally centred in individuals.
Objectives: Understanding and building theory on innovative work behaviour (IWB), as well as the parallel measurement thereof, is a prerequisite to the development of models for enhancing IWB. Most theorists propose IWB as a sequential process involving steps such as exploration, generativity, investigation, championing and application. These steps are also reflected in the design of IWB measurements. In this study, the theorised step-structure of IWB, as proposed by Kleysen and Street in 2001, is tested – relying on general descriptive statistics and applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with five different factorial structures tested.
Methods: Complete records for more than 3000 respondents on the IWB measure were available. The results revealed that exploration and generativity occur more often than investigation, championing and application, alerting theorists to the dwindling effect of creative ideas and also to the hierarchical nature of the steps embedded in IWB. With regard to structure, the results revealed that the IWB steps were correlated, not orthogonal, and unlikely to be sequential as theorised. The initial steps of IWB (exploration and generativity) are therefore linked to the latter steps (investigation, championing and application), implying that employees are cognisant of the latter steps when engaging in the former.
Results: The results of this study suggest reconsidering the segmented stepwise thinking regarding IWB. It also has important practical implications for stimulating IWB: Enabling individuals to manage the latter ‘steps’ of the IWB may well encourage the creativity and curiosity associated with the former ‘steps’.
Conclusion: The research provides important insights into the nature of IWB, informing theoretical models using data-driven information.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 5435Total article views: 15745
Crossref Citations
1. Leader-member exchange, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and sustainability, and innovation behavior
Marsudi Lestariningsih, Wirawan Endro Dwi Radianto, Ari Kuntardina, Damayanti Damayanti, Marsudi Endang Sri Rejeki
Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review vol: 10 issue: 1 first page: 99 year: 2026
doi: 10.22495/cgsrv10i1p9
2. A Framework for Employee Creative and Innovative Behaviour Idea Journey
Eleck Shabani Masianoga, Leonard Chakauya
Open Journal of Business and Management vol: 11 issue: 03 first page: 839 year: 2023
doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.113045
3. Structural validity and measurement invariance of the short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) in selected countries
Renier Steyn, Takawira Munyaradzi Ndofirepi
Cogent Psychology vol: 9 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/23311908.2022.2095035
4. Going green at work: a psychometric assessment of the green innovative work behaviour scale
Rinki Dahiya
International Journal of Organizational Analysis vol: 33 issue: 8 first page: 2649 year: 2025
doi: 10.1108/IJOA-01-2024-4164
5. Psychological contract breach and innovative work behaviour: Systematic literature review
Larysa Botha, Renier Steyn
The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management vol: 12 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/sajesbm.v12i1.333
6. Psychological capital, innovators’ DNA and innovative behaviour
Karen M. Milner, Nadia Criticos
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology vol: 49 year: 2023
doi: 10.4102/sajip.v49i0.1994
7. Gender differences in the relationship between innovation and its antecedents
Renier Steyn, Gideon de Bruin
South African Journal of Business Management vol: 51 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/sajbm.v51i1.1675
8. Validation of innovative work behaviour scale: Indian apparel manufacturing sector
Rinki Dahiya, Juhi Raghuvanshi
Asia Pacific Management Review vol: 27 issue: 2 first page: 120 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.06.002
9. Employee voice and innovative work behaviour: empirical evidence from South Africa
Larysa Botha, Renier Steyn, Daryl O’Connor
Cogent Psychology vol: 9 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.1080/23311908.2022.2080323
10. Understanding the relationship between organizational support and innovative work behaviour: perspectives of South African manufacturing company employees
Kabelo Nonyana, Mphoreng M. Mmako, Thulani B. Skosana
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) vol: 14 issue: 4 first page: 124 year: 2025
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4037
