Original Research
Psychosocial and institutional factors as determinants of entrepreneurs’ subjective well-being: Empirical evidence from a multilevel analysis
Submitted: 21 January 2026 | Published: 18 May 2026
About the author(s)
Arben Tërstena, Department of Business Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management, University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj, Ferizaj, SerbiaLulzim Idrizi, Department of Architecture, Design, and Wood Technology, Faculty of Interior Architecture and Furniture Design, University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj, Ferizaj, Serbia
Gazmend Deda, Department of Business Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management, University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj, Ferizaj, Serbia
Ismail Mehmeti, Department of Business Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management, University of Applied Sciences in Ferizaj, Ferizaj, Serbia
Abstract
Background: Entrepreneurial activity is widely recognised as a key driver of economic growth, innovation and employment; however, comparatively less scholarly attention has been devoted to the subjective well-being (SWB) of entrepreneurs. Existing studies tend to focus either on individual-level determinants or on broader institutional conditions, rarely integrating both perspectives within a single analytical framework.
Aim: The aim of this study is to examine how psychosocial and institutional factors jointly shape entrepreneurs’ SWB, measured through life satisfaction.
Setting: The study adopts a cross-national perspective, analysing self-employed individuals operating in diverse institutional environments across multiple countries.
Methods: Drawing on well-being economics, self-determination theory and institutional theory, the study employs a multilevel empirical approach that accounts for the hierarchical structure of individuals nested within countries. Cross-national survey data on self-employed individuals are combined with country-level indicators of institutional quality and analysed using mixed-effects logistic regression models.
Results: The findings indicate that psychosocial factors, including job satisfaction, perceived financial situation, optimism, social trust and self-assessed health, are strong and consistent predictors of entrepreneurs’ life satisfaction. In addition, institutional conditions such as political stability, business freedom, regulatory efficiency and control of corruption exert a significant contextual influence on entrepreneurial well-being.
Conclusion: Entrepreneurs’ SWB is shaped by the interaction of individual psychosocial resources and the broader institutional environment. Supportive governance and regulatory frameworks enhance life satisfaction beyond individual-level characteristics alone.
Contribution: By integrating micro- and macro-level determinants within a unified multilevel framework, this study advances the entrepreneurship and well-being literature and offers policy-relevant insights for fostering sustainable and supportive entrepreneurial ecosystems.
Keywords
JEL Codes
Sustainable Development Goal
Metrics
Total abstract views: 331Total article views: 271